| Sample
1: Japanese to English, technical paper [ |
|
![]() |
1. Introduction |
![]() |
Fig.1(a) shows general
configuration of a machining system. Machining force is expressed by
a curve. The force flow curve forms a 'C' loop starting at the machining
tool and ending at the work. The machining system deforms along the
C loop, and dislocation of the start and end points causes machining error.
Fig.1(b) sketches how we compensate the machining error. The
dislocation is corrected by detecting the machining force and estimating
the machine deformation. The authors previously proposed a force sensor
with actively controlled compliance[1]. This sensor provides negative
compliance. The sensor deforms in the direction opposite to the force
applied.
|
![]() |
This paper reports our analysis of the machining process to compensate machining error using negative compliance. It further shows a 3-axis negative compliance planar grinding system using a ring-shaped active force sensor we developed to verify our method. It also evaluates our method of machining error compensation from tests using a planar grinding system, we developed, with a cup grinder and water pressure turbine motor that actually grinds silicon wafers. |
![]() |
2. Machining process
analysis
|
![]() |
Fig. 2(b) shows the machining process with negative compliance. To compensate the spring-back, the negative compliance device adds cutting depth. When the initial depth of cut is Z, the following equations (1), (2), and (3) describe machining force F, spring-back S and machining error E, respectively. The suffix 0 indicates initial state. Cm is machining compliance defined as the ratio (cutting depth)/(machining force). Cs is the machining system compliance. |